[J SAI DEEPAK- BIO] -BOOKS, CASES,AGE ,WIFE, QUALIFICATIONS AND MORE
BRIEF IDEA ABOUT THE PERSON
J Sai Deepak , a name that is earning an identity of itself from the past half a decade , and continuously growing in it’s stature as we speak of it . Reasons are many, person is one. Not every person has risen with such a degree of pace ,especially when you are not a social media influencer or an actor. What makes him special is the dive he took in the world of knowledge, more precisely when he became vocal about the issues that relate to the concept of India consciousness as a whole and the bias beliefs that separate and divide the core community norms , what they were meant to be, to the ones that were shaped due to the colonial mindset.
If explained in plain intro: He is an Indian lawyer and a prominent advocate for free speech and conservative values starting his career in 2009. He has gained a significant following in India for his outspoken opinions and views on a range of social, political, and legal issues. He has also been a vocal critic of the Indian government’s handling of issues such as the Citizenship Amendment Act and the recent farmers’ protests. Sai Deepak is known for his frequent appearances on news channels and for his active presence on social media. He is also the founder of the legal advocacy group, “Lawyers’ Voice” in 2016.
BOOKS THAT MADE HIM POPULAR
ADCOVATE-CUM-AUTHOR-J SAI DEEPAK started his journey of being an author of a bestselling book when he got a knock on his head of the whole prejudice idea of the concept embedded in the values and beliefs of the people, about themselves, about their identity as a Hindustani, about a Indic community as a whole, of the Indian subcontinent Civilisation, engraved deeply because of the false play of invaders from foreign land, especially Europe.
This struck him especially due to the cases he encountered regarding the most famous Sabrimala temple, HRCE petition, Padmanabhaswamy temple case, Art.370 chaos, CAA act . these all cases and the information he tried to gather from the surroundings , various intellectuals books’Â made him realize that the identity of the people of India has been divided according to the European mindset that they imposed on us . AND SO, he set on the path to contribute his part to tell people what has gone wrong .
INDIA THAT IS BHARAT: COLONIALITY, CIVILISATION, CONSTITUTION
INDIA ,BHARAT AD PAKISTAN
  MUST READ BOOKS TO RECTIFY THE FALSE MINDSET THAT WAS BEING IMPLIED ON THE INDIC CORE VALUES.
The first 2 books of a comprehensive trilogy, explores the influence of European ‘colonial consciousness’ (or ‘coloniality’), in particular its religious and racial roots, on Bharat as the successor state to the Indic civilisation and the origins of the Indian Constitution. It lays the foundation for its sequels by covering the period between the Age of Discovery, marked by Christopher Columbus’ expedition in 1492, and the reshaping of Bharat through a British-made constitution-the Government of India Act of 1919. This includes international developments leading to the founding of the League of Nations by Western powers that tangibly impacted this journey.
PERSONAL DETAILS
SAI DEEPAK J HAS NOT REVEALED MUCH ABOUT HIM, HIS FAMILY AND HIS POINT OF INTERESTS TO THE PEOPLE WHO LOVE HIM. HE BELIEVE IN SECRECY, SO THERE IS LESS DETAILED INFO ABOUT HIS FAMILY .
| NAME | SAI DEEPAK IYER J |
| FAMOUS FOR: | 1.ADVOCATE( SABRIMALA TEMPLE)
2.AUTHOR(TRILOGY OF INDIA THAT IS BHARAT) 3.DEBATES ON INDIC CIVILISATION |
| DATE OF BIRTH | 23rd November 1985 |
| AGE | 37 |
| BIRTHPLACE | Hyderabad, Telangana, India |
| ZODIAC/SUN SIGN | Sagittarius
|
| RELIGION | Hinduism |
| HEIGHT | 5 FEET 6 INCHES |
| WEIGHT | 59 KG |
| EYE /HAIR COLOUR | purple/dark |
| WIFE | Akshara Bala
|
| OFFSPRINGS/CHILDREN | N/A |
| NET WORTH | 1-2 CRORE RUPEES ( APPROX.) |
| MARRIED IN | 2014 |
| PARENTS | NAME N/A
|
EDUCATION
Born into a middle class family Sai Deepak j went to study in the initial days for education. he went to to St. Anthony’s high school in Hyderabad for his optional training , according to his Facebook page .
After his primary and secondary education , He applied for anna university in 2002, graduating with a four year B.TECH degree in 2006. Later, his interests led him to pursue legal course that started in the same year in which he completed his graduation in the Indian Institute of technology , Kharagpur . He graduated with a L.L.B degree in 2009 . Then he opted for Litigation as his future.
colleges referred:
CAREER
Sai Deepak J is a well-known Indian lawyer, author, and public speaker. He is known for his work in the areas of constitutional law, commercial litigation, and intellectual property law.
He first for the first 7 years form 2009-2016(mid) , worked mainly intellectual property law and competition law. in this period he was given the opportunity to work at few landmark judgements like – TATA & SONS VS. GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, TURTLE VS. TATA, SHREYA SINGHAL VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ETC.,
Then began his bright face of his life and more of a vocal one when he got a seat and a recognition in the HRCE Petition. From then on Sai was more frequently encountering cases related to constitutional significance the most famous being SABRIMALA AYYAPA TEMPLE, PADMANABHASWAMY TEMPLE cases, which added colours to his career track record. He was a already an eloquent speaker and when he added info to his already gained knowledge, he started to get good cases, readily participating in debates – giving critical opinions on hijjab ban, harsha bajrang dal murder case and many more , then writing books .  So, this was a brief career info of sai deepak , about why he got so much regcognition .
Sai Deepak J has appeared in several high-profile cases, including the Sabarimala temple case, in which he represented the interests of the temple priests. He has also been involved in cases related to freedom of speech and expression, intellectual property rights, and religious rights.
In addition to his legal career, Sai Deepak J is also a prolific writer and speaker. He has written extensively on legal and social issues in India, and his work has been published in several leading newspapers and magazines. He is a regular commentator on television news channels, where he offers insights on current legal and political developments.
Sai Deepak J is also a popular public speaker and has delivered several keynote speeches and lectures at conferences and seminars. He is known for his engaging and informative style and is often invited to speak on issues related to constitutional law, economic policy, and social justice.
Overall, Sai Deepak J has established himself as a leading legal expert in India, and his work has been widely recognized and appreciated by his peers and the general public.
 Famous CASES REFFERED:
Padmanabhaswamy temple
The Padmanabhaswamy Temple is a Hindu temple located in Thiruvananthapuram, the capital city of the Indian state of Kerala. The temple is dedicated to Lord Vishnu, and is one of the 108 Divya Desams (holy abodes of Lord Vishnu) in India.
The temple is known for its intricate Dravidian-style architecture and its association with the former ruling family of Travancore. The temple’s main deity is Lord Padmanabha, a form of Lord Vishnu depicted in a reclining posture on the serpent Ananta. The temple is also famous for its enormous wealth, which includes gold, precious stones, and other valuables.
In recent years, the temple has been the subject of legal disputes related to its vast wealth. In 2011, the Supreme Court of India ordered that the temple’s underground vaults be opened and inventoried, revealing a wealth estimated to be worth billions of dollars. The court subsequently established a committee to oversee the management of the temple’s assets and ensure their preservation.
The temple remains a popular destination for devotees and tourists alike, and is considered one of the most important cultural and religious sites in Kerala.
There have been several high-profile legal cases related to the Padmanabhaswamy Temple in recent years. Here are some of the key judgments:
- 2011: In 2011, the Supreme Court of India ordered that the temple’s underground vaults be opened and inventoried. This decision was made in response to a petition filed by lawyer T. P. Sundararajan, who argued that the temple’s vast wealth should be used to fund social welfare programs. The inventory revealed a wealth estimated to be worth billions of dollars.
- 2014: In 2014, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the temple’s management and assets should be transferred to a trust, with the former royal family of Travancore having a ceremonial role in the temple’s affairs. The court also ordered the removal of a former temple executive officer, who had been accused of financial mismanagement.
- 2020: In 2020, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the former royal family of Travancore had no legal claim to the temple’s wealth and assets, and that the temple should be managed by a committee appointed by the Kerala state government. The court also directed the committee to ensure the proper preservation and protection of the temple’s heritage and cultural assets.
Overall, the legal cases related to the Padmanabhaswamy Temple have highlighted important questions about the management and preservation of India’s cultural and religious heritage, as well as the role of the state in regulating religious institutions.
The temple is one of the most popular pilgrimage sites in India, attracting millions of devotees every year, particularly during the annual Mandala Pooja and Makaravilakku festivals. However, the temple has also been the subject of controversy in recent years, related to the longstanding practice of not allowing women of menstruating age (typically ages 10-50) to enter the temple.
In September 2018, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the ban on women of menstruating age was unconstitutional, and that all women, regardless of age, had the right to enter the temple. This decision was met with protests and resistance from some devotees, who argued that the temple’s tradition and customs should be respected.
In January 2019, two women in their early 40s made history by entering the temple for the first time since the court’s ruling. However, their visit was met with widespread protests and violence from those who opposed the court’s decision. The issue remains contentious and has raised questions about gender equality, religious freedom, and the role of the state in regulating religious practices
In September 2018, the Supreme Court of India issued a landmark judgment in the Sabarimala temple case, declaring that the ban on the entry of women of menstruating age (between 10 and 50 years) into the temple was unconstitutional and violated their fundamental rights.
The court held that the custom of barring women of a certain age from entering the temple was discriminatory and based on notions of “purity and pollution”, which were archaic and had no place in a modern, secular society. The court observed that the exclusion of women from the temple violated their right to worship, which was an essential part of the right to equality guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
The judgment was met with a mixed response, with some hailing it as a victory for gender equality and women’s rights, and others arguing that it amounted to interference in religious matters and undermined the traditions of the temple. The decision also sparked widespread protests and violence in Kerala, with some devotees opposing the entry of women into the temple and clashing with police.
In February 2020, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court declined to refer the Sabarimala case to a larger bench for review, and upheld its earlier judgment. The court reiterated that the right to worship was subject to constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination, and that religious customs and practices could not be used to perpetuate gender discrimination. However, the issue remains contentious and has yet to be fully resolved.